Skip to main content

Half measures on heat pumps

Through the "Heat and Buildings Strategy", the UK government has set out its plan to incentivise people to install low-carbon heating systems in what it calls a simple, fair, and cheap way as they come to replace their old boilers over the coming decade.  New grants of £5,000 will be available from April next year to encourage homeowners to install more efficient, low carbon heating systems – like heat pumps that do not emit carbon when used – through a new £450 million 3-year Boiler Upgrade Scheme. However, it has been widely criticised as inadequate and a strategy without a strategy.  Essentially, it will benefit those who can afford more readily to replace their boiler.  

Undoubtedly, the grants will be welcome to those who plan to replace their boilers in the next three years, and it might encourage others to do so, but for too many households, it leaves them between a rock and a hard place.  There are no plans to phase out gas boilers in existing homes.  Yet, that is what we should be doing. But it requires a greater commitment of funding, particularly for low-income families.  Given that the average cost of installing a heat pump is around £10,000, the government's plan is a half measure. 

When it comes to green homes, the UK is way behind other countries. As so often, the UK does too little, too late. 

According to an assessment of the most up to date data by Greenpeace, the UK sells and installs fewer heat pumps per household than Poland, Slovakia, Estonia, and most other European countries.

The data provided to Greenpeace UK by the European Heat Pump Association shows how the UK is seriously lagging behind its European neighbours when switching to clean home heating sources and decarbonising its housing sector.

Of the twenty-one countries for which data was available, the UK came bottom on heat pump sales last year, with just 1.3 heat pumps sold per 1000 households. The UK was second to last for total installations, with just 10 per 1000 households.  

The UK’s heat pump sales figures per household were three times lower than in Poland, ten times lower than France, and thirty-two times lower than sales in Norway.

The disparity is even greater for installations. The UK installed more than five times fewer heat pumps than Lithuania, more than thirty times fewer than Estonia, and sixty times fewer heat pumps than Norway – who topped the charts both in sales and installations.

Poorly insulated homes are the major block on heat pump installation. 

Currently, housing is responsible for around 14% of the UK’s total greenhouse gas emissions, mostly down to gas boiler heating systems in poorly insulated homes. However, as countries worldwide ramp up their efforts to decarbonise housing to help tackle the climate crisis, heat pumps are widely anticipated to become the alternative to gas boilers for heating homes.

This slow rollout of clean sources of home heating in the UK is not only a missed opportunity to create new long-term, green jobs and boost economic growth, but it also risks jeopardising plans to decarbonise housing and derail the UK’s climate commitments. Furthermore, without action, it will undermine the UK’s leadership as host of the upcoming global climate conference, COP26, held in Glasgow in November.  The government has taken the first step, but much more is needed urgently.  It is not something that can simply be left to the market.   We need 1) an intensive effort to improve home insulation with targets set region by region and 2) a phase-out of gas boilers. 

Greenpeace UK’s policy director, Doug Parr, said:

“The UK already has the draughtiest homes in western Europe, now we’re last when it comes to clean heating too. We perform better in Eurovision than we do decarbonising our homes, and that’s saying something.

“If the government wants a chance to catch up, it needs a proper strategy and enough cash to clean up our homes on a massive scale. This means substantial grants for heat pump installations, especially for the poorest families, removing VAT on green home technologies and a phase-out of gas boilers early next decade.

“Without these measures, which many of our European neighbours already have in place, we’ll fall further behind on the ‘green homes’ leaderboard. But more importantly we’ll fail to remove emissions from homes fast enough to meet our legally-binding climate obligations.”

Greenpeace UK is calling on the government to learn from the policies introduced across Europe that have delivered much faster deployment of heat pumps. This starts with a comprehensive package of grants, loans, and tax incentives, such as removal of VAT on heat pumps and energy efficiency products, as well as 0% or low-cost loans for installation.

It is vital to pay particular care to ensure low-income families are not disadvantaged by the high capital costs. The UK would also require a commitment to phasing out new gas boiler installations early in the 2030s within its Heat and Buildings Strategy.

The government grants to cover installation costs for heat pumps should be offered at a level that aims to make the upfront costs of installing a heat pump, and complementary energy efficiency measures the same as replacing a gas boiler, with subsidies reducing over time as costs fall. In addition, the entire cost should be covered by grants for low-income households.

Greenpeace estimate this will require a new public investment of £4.76 billion from the Chancellor at the Spending Review to leverage private investment, accelerate heat pump installation, down the cost curve, and be fair to low-income households. In addition, a further £7 billion of public investment is required at the Spending Review for energy efficiency measures, such as insulation and double glazing, to sufficiently cut emissions from housing.

Let's insulate to a better future. 

Sources: Greenpeace UK, UK Government



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Prioritising people in nursing care.

There has been in recent years concern that care in the NHS has not been sufficiently 'patient centred', or responsive to the needs of the patient on a case basis. It has been felt in care that it as been the patient who has had to adapt to the regime of care, rather than the other way around. Putting patients at the centre of care means being responsive to their needs and supporting them through the process of health care delivery.  Patients should not become identikit sausages in a production line. The nurses body, the Nursing and Midwifery Council has responded to this challenge with a revised code of practice reflection get changes in health and social care since the previous code was published in 2008. The Code describes the professional standards of practice and behaviour for nurses and midwives. Four themes describe what nurses and midwives are expected to do: prioritise people practise effectively preserve safety, and promote professionalism and trust. The

Ian Duncan-Smith says he wants to make those on benefits 'better people'!

By any account, the government's austerity strategy is utilitarian. It justifies its approach by the presumed potential ends. It's objective is to cut the deficit, but it has also adopted another objective which is specifically targeted. It seeks to drive people off benefits and 'back to work'.  The two together are toxic to the poorest in society. Those least able to cope are the most affected by the cuts in benefits and the loss of services. It is the coupling of these two strategic aims that make their policies ethically questionable. For, by combining the two, slashing the value of benefits to make budget savings while also changing the benefits system, the highest burden falls on a specific group, those dependent on benefits. For the greater good of the majority, a minority group, those on benefits, are being sacrificed; sacrificed on the altar of austerity. And they are being sacrificed in part so that others may be spared. Utilitarian ethics considers the ba

When Finance Drives Destruction

Tackling climate change means stopping the funding of rainforest destruction, says a significant study commissioned by the World Wildlife Fund.  The UK's financial services have provided directly over £8.7 billion to 167 different traders, processors, and buyers of forest-risk commodities (cocoa, rubber, timber, soy, beef, palm oil, pulp & paper) from 2013 to 2021.   With direct and indirect investment,  the figure rises to a staggering £200 bn.  Whilst not all that investment is in destructive projects,  the study concludes there is little transparency on the risk.  Finance is the oil in the economic machine.  But it also drives decisions. We all know the importance of money. We borrow to invest. So much depends on it, such as company pensions.  Do we really know what our pension pots are doing? We invest for the future. But what kind of future? Is all investment good?  Much investment is bad. Investment drives the nature of our economy. It drives our decisions as individuals,