Skip to main content

Hope for a COVID-19 vaccine?

So much now depends on developing a vaccine against COVID-19, but how long could that take?

The best estimate is that it would take at least twelve months. The best chance currently is one being developed in the United States.

One way to generate a vaccine is to replicate the bit of the virus that causes the immune system to react, but without the virus' potential for taking over the cells of the body that host it. It is a bit like finding a key that fits a lock but doesn't allow the thief to enter.



The estimate is that a vaccine for Covid-19 is at least 12 months away. A trial of a vaccine has begun in the United States.

The group based in Seattle, Washington, had been working on a similar virus and so have been able to switch to Covid-19.

They have reproduced a bit of RNA that acts as a template for a bit of the virus that would be recognised by the immune system. 

It is an ingenious trick they are using, which is to use a bit of RNA to get cells of our bodies to produce a protein that forms part of the outer shell of the coronavirus.

A virus is essentially a packet carrying all the RNA needed to create new replica viruses.   It needs the machinery of our cells to do this.  It is a bit like an alien species that invades our cells so that these cells then manufacture replica viruses that can then be released.

RNA, among other things, is a molecule that is used by our cells as a kind of template to produce particular proteins.  In this case, by injecting a bit of RNA, our immune system will hopefully then start producing antibodies to the protein it produces. It will then have the 'memory' or ability to produce it in response to the same protein on the virus shell. Very neat

Currently, it is in a Phase 1 trial stage, which looks at safety issues and whether the immune system is producing antibodies to the protein.

If it looks promising, it will then be rolled out for a larger trial to test for its efficacy in creating immunity to COVID-19 in the population. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Prioritising people in nursing care.

There has been in recent years concern that care in the NHS has not been sufficiently 'patient centred', or responsive to the needs of the patient on a case basis. It has been felt in care that it as been the patient who has had to adapt to the regime of care, rather than the other way around. Putting patients at the centre of care means being responsive to their needs and supporting them through the process of health care delivery.  Patients should not become identikit sausages in a production line. The nurses body, the Nursing and Midwifery Council has responded to this challenge with a revised code of practice reflection get changes in health and social care since the previous code was published in 2008. The Code describes the professional standards of practice and behaviour for nurses and midwives. Four themes describe what nurses and midwives are expected to do: prioritise people practise effectively preserve safety, and promote professionalism and trust. The

Ian Duncan-Smith says he wants to make those on benefits 'better people'!

By any account, the government's austerity strategy is utilitarian. It justifies its approach by the presumed potential ends. It's objective is to cut the deficit, but it has also adopted another objective which is specifically targeted. It seeks to drive people off benefits and 'back to work'.  The two together are toxic to the poorest in society. Those least able to cope are the most affected by the cuts in benefits and the loss of services. It is the coupling of these two strategic aims that make their policies ethically questionable. For, by combining the two, slashing the value of benefits to make budget savings while also changing the benefits system, the highest burden falls on a specific group, those dependent on benefits. For the greater good of the majority, a minority group, those on benefits, are being sacrificed; sacrificed on the altar of austerity. And they are being sacrificed in part so that others may be spared. Utilitarian ethics considers the ba

When Finance Drives Destruction

Tackling climate change means stopping the funding of rainforest destruction, says a significant study commissioned by the World Wildlife Fund.  The UK's financial services have provided directly over £8.7 billion to 167 different traders, processors, and buyers of forest-risk commodities (cocoa, rubber, timber, soy, beef, palm oil, pulp & paper) from 2013 to 2021.   With direct and indirect investment,  the figure rises to a staggering £200 bn.  Whilst not all that investment is in destructive projects,  the study concludes there is little transparency on the risk.  Finance is the oil in the economic machine.  But it also drives decisions. We all know the importance of money. We borrow to invest. So much depends on it, such as company pensions.  Do we really know what our pension pots are doing? We invest for the future. But what kind of future? Is all investment good?  Much investment is bad. Investment drives the nature of our economy. It drives our decisions as individuals,