Skip to main content

Millions of COVID-19 deaths avoided by the interventions

The good news is that interventions and social distancing are working.  

An analysis by researchers at Imperial College London has found that, across 11 countries, since the beginning of the epidemic, 59,000 [21,000-120,000] deaths have been averted due to interventions. 



Keeping up the interventions is estimated to save in the long term up to 40.6 million people who would have died but for restricting the spread. 

Whilst we might be critical of the tardiness of some governments in their response to the pandemic, the message is clear; intervention works. 

More needs to be done.  In the United Kingdom there is an urgent need to ensure that front-line health workeres get the protective equipment they need.  

It is also vitally urgent that testing kits are rolled out as promised, not just for health and social care workers but for the population. 

Many more lives can be saved if this is done.  With testing for immunity, we can get a better picture of the spread and development of immunity.  Those people who have developed immunity then can return to work and help others. 

The death tolls we are seeing are scary enough, but they are nothing to the figures we will be seeing if governments had not imposed social restrictions.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Prioritising people in nursing care.

There has been in recent years concern that care in the NHS has not been sufficiently 'patient centred', or responsive to the needs of the patient on a case basis. It has been felt in care that it as been the patient who has had to adapt to the regime of care, rather than the other way around. Putting patients at the centre of care means being responsive to their needs and supporting them through the process of health care delivery.  Patients should not become identikit sausages in a production line. The nurses body, the Nursing and Midwifery Council has responded to this challenge with a revised code of practice reflection get changes in health and social care since the previous code was published in 2008. The Code describes the professional standards of practice and behaviour for nurses and midwives. Four themes describe what nurses and midwives are expected to do: prioritise people practise effectively preserve safety, and promote professionalism and trust. The

The Thin End account of COVID Lockdown

Ian Duncan-Smith says he wants to make those on benefits 'better people'!

By any account, the government's austerity strategy is utilitarian. It justifies its approach by the presumed potential ends. It's objective is to cut the deficit, but it has also adopted another objective which is specifically targeted. It seeks to drive people off benefits and 'back to work'.  The two together are toxic to the poorest in society. Those least able to cope are the most affected by the cuts in benefits and the loss of services. It is the coupling of these two strategic aims that make their policies ethically questionable. For, by combining the two, slashing the value of benefits to make budget savings while also changing the benefits system, the highest burden falls on a specific group, those dependent on benefits. For the greater good of the majority, a minority group, those on benefits, are being sacrificed; sacrificed on the altar of austerity. And they are being sacrificed in part so that others may be spared. Utilitarian ethics considers the ba