Skip to main content

King's Fund indictment on NHS and social care funding.

The King's Fund has produced a devastating analysis of the impact of the coalition government's austerity measures on the NHS and on Social Care.  Cuts in local government funding of some 40% have led to a 20% cut in funding of social care provision.  This in turn has led to an increased load on the NHS at a time when funding has been restricted and it has had to find £20 billion in 'efficiency savings'.  The real terms increase in spending on the NHS over the last five years is the lowest it has ever been at 0.9% per year.  The result is an NHS in crisis with patient care under risk.

it estimated that a funding gap of £30 billion will develop over the next five years.

Today the BMA, the doctor's representative body has issued its response to the King's Fund report.

 Dr Mark Porter, BMA council chair said:

“This report highlights the damage done to the NHS by the Health and Social Care 2012, which distracted attention from rising pressure on services and cost billions to introduce.

“Staff have done as much as they can to protect and improve patient care but, as this report lays bare, after years of underfunding the cracks are beginning to show. Patients face longer waits for treatment, services are stretched close to breaking point and staff are under unsustainable pressure.

“The NHS is the best health care system in the world, and the most efficient - there is no fat left to cut without patient care being hit. The report makes clear that further cuts to front-line staff pay are not a solution to the funding crisis in the NHS. Instead they leave staff feeling demoralised and devalued at a time when they’re working harder than ever to deliver for patients.

“With an election weeks away, politicians of all parties must stop using the NHS as a political football. Rather than short-term political game playing, the NHS needs a long-term, fully funded plan to protect patient care, support front-line staff and ensure it can rise to the enormous challenges facing it.”

Just five years ago the coalition promised to 'ring-fence' the NHS from the measures to cut the deficit.  This it has signally reneged on.  David Cameron promised there would be no 'too down' reorganisation of the NHS.  This he has reneged on.  At a time when it has faced severe financial pressure the government embarked on an extensive reorganisation of the commissioning process, which it did without proper consultation.

The King's Fund report is a shocking indictment of the coalition's approach to the NHS and social care.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ian Duncan-Smith says he wants to make those on benefits 'better people'!

By any account, the government's austerity strategy is utilitarian. It justifies its approach by the presumed potential ends. It's objective is to cut the deficit, but it has also adopted another objective which is specifically targeted. It seeks to drive people off benefits and 'back to work'.  The two together are toxic to the poorest in society. Those least able to cope are the most affected by the cuts in benefits and the loss of services. It is the coupling of these two strategic aims that make their policies ethically questionable. For, by combining the two, slashing the value of benefits to make budget savings while also changing the benefits system, the highest burden falls on a specific group, those dependent on benefits. For the greater good of the majority, a minority group, those on benefits, are being sacrificed; sacrificed on the altar of austerity. And they are being sacrificed in part so that others may be spared. Utilitarian ethics considers the ba

Prioritising people in nursing care.

There has been in recent years concern that care in the NHS has not been sufficiently 'patient centred', or responsive to the needs of the patient on a case basis. It has been felt in care that it as been the patient who has had to adapt to the regime of care, rather than the other way around. Putting patients at the centre of care means being responsive to their needs and supporting them through the process of health care delivery.  Patients should not become identikit sausages in a production line. The nurses body, the Nursing and Midwifery Council has responded to this challenge with a revised code of practice reflection get changes in health and social care since the previous code was published in 2008. The Code describes the professional standards of practice and behaviour for nurses and midwives. Four themes describe what nurses and midwives are expected to do: prioritise people practise effectively preserve safety, and promote professionalism and trust. The

Mr Duncan-Smith offers a disingenuous and divisive comparison

Some time ago, actually it was a long time ago when I was in my early teens, someone close to me bought a table. It was an early flat pack variety. It came with a top and four legs. He followed the instructions to the letter screwing the legs into the top. But when he had completed it the table wobbled. One leg he explained was shorter than the other three; so he sawed a bit from each of the other legs. The table wobbled. One leg, he explained, was longer than the other three. So, he sawed a bit off. The table wobbled. He went on cutting the legs, but the table continued to wobble. Cut, cut, cut! By this time he had convinced himself there was no alternative to it.  He ended up with a very low table indeed, supported by four very stumpy legs and a bit of cardboard placed under one of them to stop it wobbling on the uneven floor.  Mr Duncan-Smith argues that we need a 1% cap on benefits to be 'fair to average earners'. Average  earners have seen their incomes rise by less tha