Skip to main content

Coalition cuts hit social care for the elderly

In the run up to the general election I am wary of many statements I hear abut the NHS and social care.  One general statement is that 'it isn't all a question of money'.  This is true - of course it isn't all about funding.  But what are we to take from such a statement. It is usually made when people complain about the level of funding.  It is a 'catch all' reply.  It is also somewhat disingenuous as a reply because it is meant to avoid the real issue, funding.  We now spend 17% less on social care than we did I've years ago.  This is not surprising because  social care is mostly funded through local government, which has seen its financial support from central government cut by over 40 per cent in real terms since 2010.  Yes, 40%!  That is the nature of what we have been doing over the last 5 years to 'cut the deficit'.  

In his budget last week Mr Osborne cut taxes on beer and spirits to try to generate a 'feel good' factor for the general election. It was a cynical ploy.  His 'cuts' in taxes leave a £10 billion black hole in funding for public services.  If he was serious about cutting the deficit then he wouldn't cut his tax revenue. 

We have been in a strange state of hear no evil, see no evil in relation to 'the deficit'.  One of the successes we might have been proud of in the decade running up to 2010 is that pensioner poverty had bee substantial reduced.  Now that has been reversed with spending on the elderly cut by 17% in real terms over the last five years.  

Overall spending on adult social care services was £14.6 billion last year with  46 per cent of that  spent on people over 65. From April this year the Better Care Fund will transfer £3.8 billion from the NHS budget to support spending on social care.   This should also  benefit the NHS  by reducing pressure on hospitals.  But let's face the facts of this. It is arranging the deck chairs and not necessarily fixing the problem.  

The NHS has endured cuts of some £20 billion in 'efficiency savings'.   This is another euphemism I am wary of.  There is an idea that we can cut funding in ways that does not affect 'front line' services. It is as if the 'front line' was not dependent for function on the back staff, when of course it is.  We hear often of the admin work that front line staff have to do.  

Another statement I am wary of is 'we are spending more on the NHS'.  Again it is true, but it is disengenous. Spending on the NHS has gone up in real terms during the last five years by and average of 0.9 % per year.  This is the lowest average annual change of any parliament.  It  contrasts with average annual increases of 5.7 per cent under the Labour administrations between 1997 and 2010 and 3.2 per cent under the Conservative administration between 1979 and 1997.  Even Thatcher outspent this coalition government on the NHS!

Yet with massive cuts in funding for social care the burden has increasingly fallen on the NHS.  The result: an NHS crisis. 

So as we rejoice over a pint of beer let's think of the cost of that penny cut in tax. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Bad trade kills the planet.

One problem with the financial crisis of 2008/9 is that it focused attention on the banking system as if it could be separated from global economics.  It fostered the notion that all that was needed was to reform the banks and all would be well.  The underlying assumption was and is that global economics didn't and doesn't need fixing.  Everything works well but for the financial system.  Let's all keep calm and carry on.

Yet, the focus on a bad banking system hides an underlying economic malaise,  The economy depended on banks lending, and growth was predicated on debt, debt and more debt.  This was not simply a problem of the banking system.  It was, and remains a problem arising from the mythology of economic growth.

Politicians have long fostered the mythology of growth.  Growth became a  mantra.  Growth is good.  Good is growth.  Let's grow! Growth as and is presented as a miraculous cure.

Let's call this the first neoliberal myth.  The second neoliberal myth…

Hummingbird exposure to pesticides

Many have responded to the campaigns to stop the use of pesticides killing bees.  Bees are not the only animals affected.

Hummingbirds are noted as a species of conservation concern by Partners in Flight, and their populations are estimated to have declined by 60% between 1970 and 2014.



New research reveals that hummingbirds and bumble bees are being exposed to neonicotinoid and other pesticides through routes that are widespread and complex. The findings are published in Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry.

To measure exposure to pesticides in these avian pollinators, investigators made novel use of cloacal fluid and fecal pellets from hummingbirds living near blueberry fields in British Columbia. They also collected bumble bees native to Canada, and their pollen, and blueberry leaves and flowers from within conventionally sprayed and organic blueberry farms.

The researchers detected pesticides and related compounds in cloacal fluid and fecal pellets of hummingbirds revealing…

Brexit won't save the planet

Brexit isn't an ideal. It might break the cosy economic and political illusion that all growth and trade is good. But there is little thinking behind it. It won't lead to better trade. It won't save our planet.



No plan for Brexit The UK is  now just months away from leaving the European Union, yet still the government has no plan for Brexit. Sector after sector of British society are registering their concerns about the consequences of a 'no deal' Brexit.  The country is in the dark about what the future might hold.  Key issues remain unresolved, yet it is as if it doesn't matter.   Brexit, remember, means Brexit!  
Whether we are for or against Brexit we should be concerned that the government can't agree on what kind of deal they want with our biggest trading partner - the European Union.  
There is no idealism behind Brexit, and no vision for the future.  Instead, there is a blind hope that it will be 'alright on the night'.  That somehow a…