Skip to main content

Farage's normality

UKIP leader Nigel Farage has defined 'normality'. Mr Farage told BBC News: "UKIP is putting forward a policy that will take immigration in Britain back to normal. Normal was from 1950 until the year 2000."  Well, that is all well and good then.  I always felt there was something 'normal' growing up in the 1950s.  It had that sense of 'normality' about it. Cars were 'normal', though very rare in the street where I grew up.  Boats, planes and trains were very normal too.  At least they appeared normal. Nothing alien about them as far as I recall.

Of course there was a lot of hocus pocus about the paranormal, but even that was normal.  The 1970s was pretty 'normal' too even though there was a lot of spoon bending going on.  I recall the 'flood' of East Africa Asians - I recall Enoch Powell's 'Rivers of Blood' speech - and all that was 'normal' too. In the 1950s I recall the signs in windows saying 'No Blacks' - and that was normal.  I recall the dockers marching against immigration in the 1960s and that was 'normal'.  I recall a lot of concern about immigrants, and that was 'normal'.

Now it seems Mr Farage wants us to believe that we have been living through something not normal. I guess we have been living in a dream since 2000 and when we wake up to 'normality' it will be let's say 1st January 2001 - the day of abnormality.

Mr Farage is fond of playing with figures. Now he says he doesn't like caps and targets.  Yet, last week, UKIP immigration spokesman Steven Woolfe said: "We would seek to have a cap of 50,000 on those coming here for work, for a period of five years."  I suppose the difference is that UKIP caps are 'normal'.

Mr Farage has a concern about those from former communist countries coming to the UK to work, rest and play.  Why he singles these countries out is beyond comprehension.  I think we get more net migration from Spain! But then that I guess is not normal.  Normality, that is the answer to it all. If only we would get back to it, normality that is.  Back to the future.  It is 'normal' for people from Spain to come here to work, rest and play,  but not people from the former communist states!  I suppose it sounds more sinister if it is former communist countries.  Perhaps they will be undermining our democracy in the interests of a subversive Marxist conspiracy.  Spain of course used to be dictated to by General Franco, but of course that was part of 'normality' as it was between 1950 and 2000.

According to Mr Farage under UKIP, migrant workers would have to have a job paying more than £27,000 a year before being admitted - but there would be exceptions such as nurses.  Of course! Exceptions!  I recall exceptions in the days of 'normality'.  We even advertised for bus drivers. Please come and drive our buses and trains we pleaded in the days of normality, and when they came we called then niggers and made them very unwelcome.  Some stayed and generations later they have made a great contribution to our Britishness.  Thank goodness for normality.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Prioritising people in nursing care.

There has been in recent years concern that care in the NHS has not been sufficiently 'patient centred', or responsive to the needs of the patient on a case basis. It has been felt in care that it as been the patient who has had to adapt to the regime of care, rather than the other way around. Putting patients at the centre of care means being responsive to their needs and supporting them through the process of health care delivery.  Patients should not become identikit sausages in a production line. The nurses body, the Nursing and Midwifery Council has responded to this challenge with a revised code of practice reflection get changes in health and social care since the previous code was published in 2008. The Code describes the professional standards of practice and behaviour for nurses and midwives. Four themes describe what nurses and midwives are expected to do: prioritise people practise effectively preserve safety, and promote professionalism and trust. The

Ian Duncan-Smith says he wants to make those on benefits 'better people'!

By any account, the government's austerity strategy is utilitarian. It justifies its approach by the presumed potential ends. It's objective is to cut the deficit, but it has also adopted another objective which is specifically targeted. It seeks to drive people off benefits and 'back to work'.  The two together are toxic to the poorest in society. Those least able to cope are the most affected by the cuts in benefits and the loss of services. It is the coupling of these two strategic aims that make their policies ethically questionable. For, by combining the two, slashing the value of benefits to make budget savings while also changing the benefits system, the highest burden falls on a specific group, those dependent on benefits. For the greater good of the majority, a minority group, those on benefits, are being sacrificed; sacrificed on the altar of austerity. And they are being sacrificed in part so that others may be spared. Utilitarian ethics considers the ba

When Finance Drives Destruction

Tackling climate change means stopping the funding of rainforest destruction, says a significant study commissioned by the World Wildlife Fund.  The UK's financial services have provided directly over £8.7 billion to 167 different traders, processors, and buyers of forest-risk commodities (cocoa, rubber, timber, soy, beef, palm oil, pulp & paper) from 2013 to 2021.   With direct and indirect investment,  the figure rises to a staggering £200 bn.  Whilst not all that investment is in destructive projects,  the study concludes there is little transparency on the risk.  Finance is the oil in the economic machine.  But it also drives decisions. We all know the importance of money. We borrow to invest. So much depends on it, such as company pensions.  Do we really know what our pension pots are doing? We invest for the future. But what kind of future? Is all investment good?  Much investment is bad. Investment drives the nature of our economy. It drives our decisions as individuals,