Skip to main content

Frankie Sandford says 'It's time to Change'.

The Saturdays singer Frankie Sandford is wearing her heart on her sleeve today (Thursday 15 August) and fronting a new campaign for Time to Change, the mental health anti-stigma programme run by the charities Mind and Rethink Mental Illness, which aims to stamp out the stigma that surrounds mental health problems.

Alongside a host of celebrities including Ricky Hatton, Russell Kane, Suki Waterhouse and This Morning’s Matt Johnson, the ‘Issues’ and ‘What About Us’ singer has been seen wearing a heart-shaped fake tattoo designed by contemporary British artist Stuart Semple, to support Time to Change’s Time to Talk campaign.

Both Frankie and Matt have talked openly about their experiences of depression to help tackle the discrimination that many people with a mental health problem still face. A recent survey commissioned by Time to Change showed that nearly half of 25-35 year olds (45%) say that people in the public eye, such as Frankie, have made them more aware of the stigma that surrounds mental health problems.

The new research also shows that over a third of people (39%) say that hearing about a celebrity talking about their own experiences in the media has made them think more positively about mental health in general.

The Saturdays’ Frankie Sandford said: “Mental health is still such an awkward subject, yet if someone was going through another physical illness we wouldn’t hesitate to ask them how they’re doing. When I experienced depression, I had the support of friends and family which really helped - being able to talk about it is really important.

“I hope by supporting Time to Change I can raise awareness about the importance of starting a conversation. If you know someone experiencing a mental health problem, you could ask them how they are, or send them a quick text to let them know you’re there – it can make a huge difference and remind them that they’re not alone. We all have mental health, so it’s something we should definitely learn to be more open about.”

Time to Change Director Sue Baker, said: ‘Mental health problems can happen to anyone, famous or not, and we all need the support of those around us when it happens. But as this research shows, celebrities like Frankie and Matt speaking out can help the public to think differently about mental health. Hearing from someone in the public eye can help others to feel able to say ‘I’ve gone through that too’.

“Through our campaign we hope to encourage people to talk to friends and family members who have a mental health problem – it’s amazing how powerful a simple conversation can be for someone who is going through a difficult time. We need to start these conversations today and realise that it isn’t as scary as we all think. The more we’re able to speak openly about mental health problems, the earlier people will be able to seek the help and support they need.”

To start your conversation and find out which other celebrities are supporting the campaign go to time-to-change.org.uk or tweet #Timetotalk


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ian Duncan-Smith says he wants to make those on benefits 'better people'!

By any account, the government's austerity strategy is utilitarian. It justifies its approach by the presumed potential ends. It's objective is to cut the deficit, but it has also adopted another objective which is specifically targeted. It seeks to drive people off benefits and 'back to work'.  The two together are toxic to the poorest in society. Those least able to cope are the most affected by the cuts in benefits and the loss of services. It is the coupling of these two strategic aims that make their policies ethically questionable. For, by combining the two, slashing the value of benefits to make budget savings while also changing the benefits system, the highest burden falls on a specific group, those dependent on benefits. For the greater good of the majority, a minority group, those on benefits, are being sacrificed; sacrificed on the altar of austerity. And they are being sacrificed in part so that others may be spared. Utilitarian ethics considers the ba

The secret life of Giant Pandas

Giant pandas, Ailuropoda melanoleuca , have usually been regarded as solitary creatures, coming together only to mate; but recent studies have begun to reveal a secret social life for these enigmatic bears.  GPS tracking shows they cross each others path more often than previously thought, and spend time together.  What we don't know is what they are doing when together.  Photo by  Sid Balachandran  on  Unsplash For such large mammals, pandas have relatively small home ranges. Perhaps this is no surprise. Pandas feed almost exclusively on bamboo. The only real threat to pandas has come from humans. No wonder then that the panda is the symbol of the WWF.  Pandas communicate with one another through vocalization and scent marking. They spray urine, claw tree trunks and rub against objects to mark their paths, yet they do not appear to be territorial as individuals.  Pandas are 99% vegetarian, but, oddly, their digestive system is more typical of a carnivore. For the 1% of their diet

Work Capability Assessments cause suffering for the mentally ill

People suffering from mental health problems are often the most vulnerable when seeking help. Mental health can have a major impact on work, housing, relationships and finances. The Work Capability Assessments (WCA) thus present a particular challenge to those suffering mental illness.  The mentally ill also are often the least able to present their case. Staff involved in assessments lack sufficient expertise or training to understand mental health issues and how they affect capability. Because of  concerns that Work Capability Assessments will have a particularly detrimental effect on the mentally ill,  an  e-petition  on the government web site calls on the Department of Work and Pensions to exclude people with complex mental health problems such as paranoid schizophrenia and personality disorders. Problems with the WCA  have been highlighted in general by the fact that up to 78% of 'fit to work' decisions are  being overturned on appeal. It is all to the good that they