Skip to main content

BMA and RCN call on government to take urgent action on competition regulations for NHS services.

As the NHS in England faces the biggest shake-up for a generation, and with only days to go until new commissioning arrangements for NHS services come into force, doctors’ and nurses’ leaders are today (28 March 2013) calling on the Government to amend controversial regulations to make it absolutely clear how competition will be managed amidst continued confusion and anxiety about the changes. There are increasing concerns from doctors and nurses that competition will be enforced. The BMA and RCN say clarity in the legal framework is crucial, placing beyond doubt the limits of competition.

Regulations laid before Parliament last month provided greater details about how aspects of patient choice and competition would operate under the Health and Social Care Act, which takes effect on 1 April. They were intended to ensure good procurement practice, but prompted widespread concern and uncertainty about the apparent requirement for competitive tendering for most health services.

Although the regulations have since been revised to acknowledge some of these concerns, there remains a lack of clarity around when commissioners will be required to tender all services. The BMA and RCN are concerned that competition risks fragmentation of services, creates unnecessary transaction costs and increases scope for legal challenge, making it harder for the NHS to deliver high-quality, cost-effective and integrated care to patients.

During the passage of the Act, the Government stated on a number of occasions that commissioners would have the freedom to decide which services they would tender. Monitor has the task of producing guidance for commissioners on procurement and competition which is expected to provide clarity on what will be expected of commissioners and how Monitor will discharge its functions in this area. However this guidance has still not been published, causing further uncertainty for commissioners.

The BMA and RCN are asking the Government for:
Immediate and definitive assurances on whether commissioners could legitimately seek to limit competition in all circumstances where it is in patients’ best overall interests
Assurances to be clearly reflected in the legal framework
A firm commitment that commissioners could prioritise patient services over competition and choice, thereby avoiding fragmentation.

Dr Mark Porter, Chair of BMA Council, said: “Although the revised regulations improved the original wording, we stressed the need for this to be supported by clear guidance to provide the assurance and clarity that is needed to ensure that competition does not undermine integration, innovation, or clinical autonomy.

“With major NHS changes coming into force on 1 April, that guidance has still not been published. This has created great uncertainty and anxiety for clinicians and patients, and left commissioners in a potentially vulnerable state. We have not received satisfactory assurances from the Government that would alleviate the considerable fear that commissioners are facing.

“Until we see how the regulations work in practice we cannot be sure that commissioners will have the freedom to act in the best interests of patients. The stakes are too high to take such risks in what is untested territory.

“We urge the Government to give immediate and absolute assurances about the limits of competition, changing the wording of the regulations if this is what it takes, to ensure that its prior commitments match the reality on the ground. Commissioners need to be completely clear about the rules governing commissioning and to know that they will be allowed to make the best decisions for their patients.”

Dr Peter Carter, Chief Executive & General Secretary of the RCN, said: “Even with the recent revisions to the regulations there is still a worrying lack of clarity over how much freedom commissioners will have to provide the best possible care for patients. There is a very urgent need for Monitor and NHS England to publish the promised guidance for commissioners.

“We remain concerned that despite Government assurances commissioners may not be able to put the quality of patient care and integration above the need to provide competition without facing potentially costly challenges.

“The priority for the health service right now should be encouraging integration between services to cope with increasing demand and driving up the quality of patient care. Without Government assurances being reflected in the Regulations, we are concerned that clinicians will not be able to focus on these priorities and commission the services that their patients need.”

Postscript

Here are the links to the LBC broadcast of the Royal Society of Arts debate on the future of the NHS referred to by Jon Danzig in his comment below:


Comments

  1. This week there was a debate at the Royal Society of Arts, broadcast live by LBC Radio, called, “Is this the end of the NHS as we know it?’ I was first in the audience to ask a question, about the founding principles of our cherished National Health Service.

    http://goo.gl/Opnmi (1 minute 20 seconds; edited extract)

    The full debate (52 minutes)

    http://goo.gl/M5Pml

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dear Jon, Thank you for your links. I have added them as a postscript to the feature.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bad trade kills the planet.

One problem with the financial crisis of 2008/9 is that it focused attention on the banking system as if it could be separated from global economics.  It fostered the notion that all that was needed was to reform the banks and all would be well.  The underlying assumption was and is that global economics didn't and doesn't need fixing.  Everything works well but for the financial system.  Let's all keep calm and carry on.

Yet, the focus on a bad banking system hides an underlying economic malaise,  The economy depended on banks lending, and growth was predicated on debt, debt and more debt.  This was not simply a problem of the banking system.  It was, and remains a problem arising from the mythology of economic growth.

Politicians have long fostered the mythology of growth.  Growth became a  mantra.  Growth is good.  Good is growth.  Let's grow! Growth as and is presented as a miraculous cure.

Let's call this the first neoliberal myth.  The second neoliberal myth…

Hummingbird exposure to pesticides

Many have responded to the campaigns to stop the use of pesticides killing bees.  Bees are not the only animals affected.

Hummingbirds are noted as a species of conservation concern by Partners in Flight, and their populations are estimated to have declined by 60% between 1970 and 2014.



New research reveals that hummingbirds and bumble bees are being exposed to neonicotinoid and other pesticides through routes that are widespread and complex. The findings are published in Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry.

To measure exposure to pesticides in these avian pollinators, investigators made novel use of cloacal fluid and fecal pellets from hummingbirds living near blueberry fields in British Columbia. They also collected bumble bees native to Canada, and their pollen, and blueberry leaves and flowers from within conventionally sprayed and organic blueberry farms.

The researchers detected pesticides and related compounds in cloacal fluid and fecal pellets of hummingbirds revealing…

Brexit won't save the planet

Brexit isn't an ideal. It might break the cosy economic and political illusion that all growth and trade is good. But there is little thinking behind it. It won't lead to better trade. It won't save our planet.



No plan for Brexit The UK is  now just months away from leaving the European Union, yet still the government has no plan for Brexit. Sector after sector of British society are registering their concerns about the consequences of a 'no deal' Brexit.  The country is in the dark about what the future might hold.  Key issues remain unresolved, yet it is as if it doesn't matter.   Brexit, remember, means Brexit!  
Whether we are for or against Brexit we should be concerned that the government can't agree on what kind of deal they want with our biggest trading partner - the European Union.  
There is no idealism behind Brexit, and no vision for the future.  Instead, there is a blind hope that it will be 'alright on the night'.  That somehow a…