Skip to main content

Lack of funding undermining primary medical care

General practice cannot reached its full potential in the face of continuing under-investment in the profession, the cutting of MPIG funding, the problems recruiting and retaining GPs and the lack of investment in premises, GP leaders have warned.

Backing a motion1 at the annual Local Medical Committee’s conference in York, GPs said that general practice can be the solution to many of the current problems facing the NHS, but was held back by the serious damage being done to the profession.

The calls come weeks after the British Medical Association launched its ‘Your GP cares’ campaign to support GPs and calls for long term, sustainable investment to be made in GP services across the UK, to:

· Expand the overall number of GPs to attract, retain and expand the number of GPs and ensure patients are given the time, care and services they deserve

· Expand the numbers of other practice staff so each practice has enough nurses and other staff to meet the increasing needs of especially older and vulnerable patients

· Improve and bring up to scratch the premises GP services are provided from and ensure local practices have the resources they need to sustain current high levels of care

Commenting, Dr Chaand Nagpaul, Chair of the BMA’s General Practitioners Committee, added:

“As GPs we care immensely about our patients and we are as concerned as they are by the constraints impacting on services, which are undermining our ability to do the best for them.

“GPs are constantly fire-fighting to provide the services their patients need in the face of increasing workload pressures2, the worsening state of GP premises and the rising number of vulnerable patients3 and those living with a chronic condition4 for whom the standard 10 minute appointment is simply not enough. We are also now increasingly providing services that had previously been delivered in hospitals, which is raising demand for services further.

“This can all have a detrimental effect on the services practices are able to provide, leaving patients frustrated as more are left waiting for appointments. It is vital that we address this issue, which is why the ‘Your GP cares’ campaign aims to bring to people’s attention the true picture of general practice.

“General practice can be a key solution to managing the increasing pressure on the health service, but only if its receives the long-term, sustainable investment in the things that will make a real difference to patients – more GPs, more practice staff and fit for purpose premises.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Prioritising people in nursing care.

There has been in recent years concern that care in the NHS has not been sufficiently 'patient centred', or responsive to the needs of the patient on a case basis. It has been felt in care that it as been the patient who has had to adapt to the regime of care, rather than the other way around. Putting patients at the centre of care means being responsive to their needs and supporting them through the process of health care delivery.  Patients should not become identikit sausages in a production line. The nurses body, the Nursing and Midwifery Council has responded to this challenge with a revised code of practice reflection get changes in health and social care since the previous code was published in 2008. The Code describes the professional standards of practice and behaviour for nurses and midwives. Four themes describe what nurses and midwives are expected to do: prioritise people practise effectively preserve safety, and promote professionalism and trust. The

The Thin End account of COVID Lockdown

Ian Duncan-Smith says he wants to make those on benefits 'better people'!

By any account, the government's austerity strategy is utilitarian. It justifies its approach by the presumed potential ends. It's objective is to cut the deficit, but it has also adopted another objective which is specifically targeted. It seeks to drive people off benefits and 'back to work'.  The two together are toxic to the poorest in society. Those least able to cope are the most affected by the cuts in benefits and the loss of services. It is the coupling of these two strategic aims that make their policies ethically questionable. For, by combining the two, slashing the value of benefits to make budget savings while also changing the benefits system, the highest burden falls on a specific group, those dependent on benefits. For the greater good of the majority, a minority group, those on benefits, are being sacrificed; sacrificed on the altar of austerity. And they are being sacrificed in part so that others may be spared. Utilitarian ethics considers the ba