Skip to main content

A time for every purpose

All life moves. Or, more precisely, all life moves purposefully.  This is true even for trees and plants.  Movement is essential for maintaining life.  Animals migrate; plants disperse.  Some form of migration is an ingredient of all life.  For many organisms, it is a key function of reproduction.  We don't reproduce merely to create a new organism, but also to disperse the population - finding new fertile ground, or resources. Reproduction is a form of migration. Reproduction isn't merely to replicate. Reproduction produces change and diversity.  While we may have strong resemblences in families, we also have differences.  Creating a difference is how evolution works.  In this sense, nature is a continuous exploratory process, finding what works best.  Nature senses change and responds.  Some of this is immediate and physiological or behavioural; some of it is over generations. 

If we look at a forest over long periods of time, we would see that it shifts. There is a movement over generations.  But we see movement in plants on a daily basis.  Flowers open and stems bend toward the sun - they are phototropic.  As all gardeners know, light is vital to the plant. 


Charles Darwin and his son carried out an elegant experiment on grass stems.  They put a cap on the very tip of the young stems.  What they found was that the stems no longer bent towards the light.  The bending is produced by elongation of the plant cells on one side of the stem.  Clearly, some kind of signal was being sent to these cells from the light-sensitive tip.  The Danish physiologist, Peter Boysen-Jensen, later showed that this signal was a chemical that travelled down from the tip only on the shaded side of the stem. The tips contain light-sensitive proteins - phototropins - that cause a hormone - auxin - to be transported down the stem. 

Day length matters to a plant. Plants are good time-keepers. The Earth spins as it orbits the sun, and it is the measure of day length that really matters.  Some plants - short-day plants - such as rice, will only flower when the day length drops below a certain threshold.  Others, such as spinach and sugar beet are long-day plants - flowering only when the day length rises above a certain level.  In this way, the plants monitor the seasons. Some are day-length neutral. 

Hello, darkness my old friend.  We refer to short-day plants, but it is the night that matters - the period of darkness.  A short-day plant will only flower if it gets a continuous period of darkness for a given length of time.  So, how do plants do this? 

One idea is that it involves a synchrony - a lining up - of an internal physiological clock with the light/dark periodicity.  Plants flower when these are in synchrony. But how would this work?

The plant produces a bloom inducing protein in a rhythmic cycle - the protein production ebbs and flows, but it is usually broken down as soon as it is produced, and this prevents the concentration rising.  As the evenings get lighter, this breakdown of the protein is blocked, and the concentration increases and triggers flowering.  That is one idea, but plants may have found different ways to solve the problem. 

Production of seed is only half of the solution.  Dispersal is a major part of the trick, for which nature has produced a variety of means.  And this is where plants use animals - animals move at greater speeds and distance. They may collect and bury nuts; their fur may pick up seed.  For plants and trees, animals make ideal dispersal kits.  Evolution is an interactive process. 

Ray Noble is a chartered biologist and Fellow of the Royal Society of Biology

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ian Duncan-Smith says he wants to make those on benefits 'better people'!

By any account, the government's austerity strategy is utilitarian. It justifies its approach by the presumed potential ends. It's objective is to cut the deficit, but it has also adopted another objective which is specifically targeted. It seeks to drive people off benefits and 'back to work'.  The two together are toxic to the poorest in society. Those least able to cope are the most affected by the cuts in benefits and the loss of services. It is the coupling of these two strategic aims that make their policies ethically questionable. For, by combining the two, slashing the value of benefits to make budget savings while also changing the benefits system, the highest burden falls on a specific group, those dependent on benefits. For the greater good of the majority, a minority group, those on benefits, are being sacrificed; sacrificed on the altar of austerity. And they are being sacrificed in part so that others may be spared. Utilitarian ethics considers the ba...

Ethical considerations of a National DNA database.

Plans for a national DNA database   will be revealed by the Prime Minister this week. This is the same proposal the Tories and Liberal Democrats opposed when presented by the Blair government because they argued it posed  a threat to civil liberties. This time it is expected to offer an 'opt-out' clause for those who do not wish their data to be stored; exactly how this would operate isn't yet clear. But does it matter and does it really pose a threat to civil liberties? When it comes to biology and ethics we tend to have a distorted view of DNA and genetics. This is for two reasons. The first is that it is thought that our genome somehow represents the individual as a code that then gets translated. This is biologically speaking wrong. DNA is a template and part of the machinery for making proteins. It isn't a code in anything like the sense of being a 'blueprint' or 'book of life'.  Although these metaphors are used often they are just that, metapho...

The unethical language of 'welfare dependency'

It is unethical to stigmatise people without foundation. Creating a stereotype, a generalised brand, in order to  demonize a group regardless of the individual and without regard for the potential harm it may do is unfair and prejudicial. It is one reason, and a major one, why racism is unethical; it fails to give a fair consideration of interest to a group of people simply because they are branded in this way. They are not worthy of equal consideration because they are different.  It seeks also to influence the attitudes of others to those stereotyped. If I said 'the Irish are lazy'; you would rightly respond that this is a ridiculous and unfounded stereotype. It brands all Irish on the basis of a prejudice. It is harmful certainly; but it is worse if I intend it to be harmful. If I intend to influence the attitude of others. And so it is with 'the unemployed'. All I need do is substitute 'work-shy' and use it in an injudicious way; to imply that it applies to...