Skip to main content

Private providers not the answer to NHS problems

The doctor's organisation the British Medical Association says today that the government's  top-down reorganisation of the NHS was 'unwanted'. It also says that private provisions is not the answer to the problems of the NHS.  General practice the BMA says is struggling to keep pace with rising demands in the face of cuts in funding.

There is a tendency when the NHS is under strain to refer to an ageing population and the demands on the NHS. But this crisis is of the government's making.  If you cut resources it is going to have an impact on frontline services.  The Tory leadership promised there would be no 'top down' reorganisation of the NHS. They reneged on that and imposed a complex reorganisation which is causing problems. The coalition said that the NHS would be ring-fenced from the cuts. It has not been. Calling cuts efficient savings does not mean they are not cuts.  These cuts amount to  £20 billion over the five years of coalition government. You cannot take that out of the system and expect no consequences. Add on top of that the cost and problems or a major reorganisation, under funding of GP practices, and you have the recipe for the current crisis in A&E.  As the BMA rightly say problems at the hospital front for of the NHS are linked to shortages at the back door and in social care services that block beds and increase waiting lists.

What is unforgivable is that the government have been repeatedly warned over the last five years of the consequences of their policies and cuts.

Responding to the publication of weekly figures which show pressure on England's A&E departments is getting worse, Dr Mark Porter, BMA council chair, said:

 “Patients should be treated on the basis of need, rather than arbitrary targets, but these figures show an NHS under extraordinary pressure, trying to cope despite inadequate resources.

“What’s happening in Hinchingbrooke today shows that the responsibility of running a critical public service can never be handed over, and so the insistence on private providers as a potential solution to problems facing Hinchingbrooke was always misguided. It also shows that even private providers are not immune to the extreme financial pressures on NHS services, because of government underfunding.

“It’s important to remember that, while there may not be weekly performance figures for other parts of the system, what’s happening in our A&Es is reflective of, and linked to, wider pressures across the NHS.  You can’t address problems in A&E, without looking at the system as a whole.

“Problems at the hospital front door are often linked to delays at the back door. A shortage of social care beds creates ‘exit block’ in hospitals, meaning patients can’t be discharged because there is simply nowhere for them to go. This, coupled with a shortage of hospitals beds, leads to patients waiting for hours on trolleys or admitted to an inappropriate ward for their needs, affecting the quality of care they receive. This is just one example of pressure in one part of the system spilling over into other parts.

“Outside of hospitals, general practice is struggling to keep up with rising demand, carrying out 40m more consultations a year than in 2008. Investment in general practice is declining while demand is on the rise and more care is moved into the community - this simply isn’t sustainable.

“In the last week there have been lots of promises made and blame thrown around. What we need now is action. To address pressure on A&Es politicians need to look at the NHS as a whole. Investment needs to keep up with demand, every part of system - from our GP surgeries, to hospitals, to community care - needs to be supported and working well, and we must also address the acute shortage of A&E staff and GPs.

“We also need to reverse the harmful effects of Government's top down reorganisation without another NHS-wide restructure. These unwanted changes have made the delivery of joined-up care more difficult by valuing competition over integration of services, leading to care being fragmented at a time when the NHS needs to be delivering more joined up care, not less.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Bad trade kills the planet.

One problem with the financial crisis of 2008/9 is that it focused attention on the banking system as if it could be separated from global economics.  It fostered the notion that all that was needed was to reform the banks and all would be well.  The underlying assumption was and is that global economics didn't and doesn't need fixing.  Everything works well but for the financial system.  Let's all keep calm and carry on.

Yet, the focus on a bad banking system hides an underlying economic malaise,  The economy depended on banks lending, and growth was predicated on debt, debt and more debt.  This was not simply a problem of the banking system.  It was, and remains a problem arising from the mythology of economic growth.

Politicians have long fostered the mythology of growth.  Growth became a  mantra.  Growth is good.  Good is growth.  Let's grow! Growth as and is presented as a miraculous cure.

Let's call this the first neoliberal myth.  The second neoliberal myth…

Brexit won't save the planet

Brexit isn't an ideal. It might break the cosy economic and political illusion that all growth and trade is good. But there is little thinking behind it. It won't lead to better trade. It won't save our planet.



No plan for Brexit The UK is  now just months away from leaving the European Union, yet still the government has no plan for Brexit. Sector after sector of British society are registering their concerns about the consequences of a 'no deal' Brexit.  The country is in the dark about what the future might hold.  Key issues remain unresolved, yet it is as if it doesn't matter.   Brexit, remember, means Brexit!  
Whether we are for or against Brexit we should be concerned that the government can't agree on what kind of deal they want with our biggest trading partner - the European Union.  
There is no idealism behind Brexit, and no vision for the future.  Instead, there is a blind hope that it will be 'alright on the night'.  That somehow a…

Hummingbird exposure to pesticides

Many have responded to the campaigns to stop the use of pesticides killing bees.  Bees are not the only animals affected.

Hummingbirds are noted as a species of conservation concern by Partners in Flight, and their populations are estimated to have declined by 60% between 1970 and 2014.



New research reveals that hummingbirds and bumble bees are being exposed to neonicotinoid and other pesticides through routes that are widespread and complex. The findings are published in Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry.

To measure exposure to pesticides in these avian pollinators, investigators made novel use of cloacal fluid and fecal pellets from hummingbirds living near blueberry fields in British Columbia. They also collected bumble bees native to Canada, and their pollen, and blueberry leaves and flowers from within conventionally sprayed and organic blueberry farms.

The researchers detected pesticides and related compounds in cloacal fluid and fecal pellets of hummingbirds revealing…