Skip to main content

Private providers not the answer to NHS problems

The doctor's organisation the British Medical Association says today that the government's  top-down reorganisation of the NHS was 'unwanted'. It also says that private provisions is not the answer to the problems of the NHS.  General practice the BMA says is struggling to keep pace with rising demands in the face of cuts in funding.

There is a tendency when the NHS is under strain to refer to an ageing population and the demands on the NHS. But this crisis is of the government's making.  If you cut resources it is going to have an impact on frontline services.  The Tory leadership promised there would be no 'top down' reorganisation of the NHS. They reneged on that and imposed a complex reorganisation which is causing problems. The coalition said that the NHS would be ring-fenced from the cuts. It has not been. Calling cuts efficient savings does not mean they are not cuts.  These cuts amount to  £20 billion over the five years of coalition government. You cannot take that out of the system and expect no consequences. Add on top of that the cost and problems or a major reorganisation, under funding of GP practices, and you have the recipe for the current crisis in A&E.  As the BMA rightly say problems at the hospital front for of the NHS are linked to shortages at the back door and in social care services that block beds and increase waiting lists.

What is unforgivable is that the government have been repeatedly warned over the last five years of the consequences of their policies and cuts.

Responding to the publication of weekly figures which show pressure on England's A&E departments is getting worse, Dr Mark Porter, BMA council chair, said:

 “Patients should be treated on the basis of need, rather than arbitrary targets, but these figures show an NHS under extraordinary pressure, trying to cope despite inadequate resources.

“What’s happening in Hinchingbrooke today shows that the responsibility of running a critical public service can never be handed over, and so the insistence on private providers as a potential solution to problems facing Hinchingbrooke was always misguided. It also shows that even private providers are not immune to the extreme financial pressures on NHS services, because of government underfunding.

“It’s important to remember that, while there may not be weekly performance figures for other parts of the system, what’s happening in our A&Es is reflective of, and linked to, wider pressures across the NHS.  You can’t address problems in A&E, without looking at the system as a whole.

“Problems at the hospital front door are often linked to delays at the back door. A shortage of social care beds creates ‘exit block’ in hospitals, meaning patients can’t be discharged because there is simply nowhere for them to go. This, coupled with a shortage of hospitals beds, leads to patients waiting for hours on trolleys or admitted to an inappropriate ward for their needs, affecting the quality of care they receive. This is just one example of pressure in one part of the system spilling over into other parts.

“Outside of hospitals, general practice is struggling to keep up with rising demand, carrying out 40m more consultations a year than in 2008. Investment in general practice is declining while demand is on the rise and more care is moved into the community - this simply isn’t sustainable.

“In the last week there have been lots of promises made and blame thrown around. What we need now is action. To address pressure on A&Es politicians need to look at the NHS as a whole. Investment needs to keep up with demand, every part of system - from our GP surgeries, to hospitals, to community care - needs to be supported and working well, and we must also address the acute shortage of A&E staff and GPs.

“We also need to reverse the harmful effects of Government's top down reorganisation without another NHS-wide restructure. These unwanted changes have made the delivery of joined-up care more difficult by valuing competition over integration of services, leading to care being fragmented at a time when the NHS needs to be delivering more joined up care, not less.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ian Duncan-Smith says he wants to make those on benefits 'better people'!

By any account, the government's austerity strategy is utilitarian. It justifies its approach by the presumed potential ends. It's objective is to cut the deficit, but it has also adopted another objective which is specifically targeted. It seeks to drive people off benefits and 'back to work'.  The two together are toxic to the poorest in society. Those least able to cope are the most affected by the cuts in benefits and the loss of services. It is the coupling of these two strategic aims that make their policies ethically questionable. For, by combining the two, slashing the value of benefits to make budget savings while also changing the benefits system, the highest burden falls on a specific group, those dependent on benefits. For the greater good of the majority, a minority group, those on benefits, are being sacrificed; sacrificed on the altar of austerity. And they are being sacrificed in part so that others may be spared. Utilitarian ethics considers the ba

A time for every purpose

All life moves. Or, more precisely, all life moves purposefully.  This is true even for trees and plants.  Movement is essential for maintaining life.  Animals migrate; plants disperse.  Some form of migration is an ingredient of all life.  For many organisms, it is a key function of reproduction.  We don't reproduce merely to create a new organism, but also to disperse the population - finding new fertile ground, or resources. Reproduction is a form of migration. Reproduction isn't merely to replicate. Reproduction produces change and diversity.  While we may have strong resemblences in families, we also have differences.  Creating a difference is how evolution works.  In this sense, nature is a continuous exploratory process, finding what works best.  Nature senses change and responds.  Some of this is immediate and physiological or behavioural; some of it is over generations.  If we look at a forest over long periods of time, we would see that it shifts. There is a movement

A weaver's tail - the harvest mouse

Living in the grass is a tiny mouse: the tiny harvest mouse, with a wonderful scientific name that sounds like the title of a Charles Dickens Novel,  Micromys minutus.   It is the only British mammal with a prehensile tail. It uses its tail to hold on to the slender grass stems, at the tops of which it builds a nest. Photo: Nick Fewing These tiny mammals (just around 5 cm long) build a spherical nest of tightly woven grass at the top of tall grasses, in which the female will give birth to about six young.  In the fields, we see cows and horses brushing away flies with their tails; often they will stand side-by-side and end-to-end, and help each other.  Two tails are better than one!  In nature, tails are put to good use.  Just as a tight-rope walker uses his pole for balance, so for some species, a tail provides balance. When running, a squirrel uses its tail as a counterbalance to help the squirrel steer and turn quickly, and the tail is used aerodynamically in flight.  But many anima